Marked work, not promises
Every report names the task, the rubric row, and the instructor's margin note. Here is a short Task 2 excerpt and a speaking sample from recent coaching.
O.K.
Task 2 / Writing / 14 Feb 2025
Est. 6.0 to target 7.0
Some people believe that university education should be free for all citizens. In my opinion, while public funding is important, a fully free system can reduce the quality of teaching and limit the number of places available.
- Task responsePosition is clear, but the second claim has no support.
- Lexical resource"Reduce the quality" is vague. Try "undermine teaching standards".
- CoherenceNo link between the claim and the example that follows.
O.K.
Speaking Part 3 / 09 Feb 2025
Est. 6.5
- Fluency & coherence
- Lexical resource
- Grammatical range
- Pronunciation
Fillers cluster around 0:42 and the answer restarts mid-sentence. The rubric note asks for one linking phrase per idea, rehearsed aloud.
Scores shown are diagnostic estimates from marked practice tasks. Results vary. We do not guarantee a band score, visa approval, or admission.
See the full sample report